Two Judgments bring the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India into focus
Two recent Supreme Court decisions shine a light on the IBBI and its proper function as a regulator.
Two recent Supreme Court decisions shine a light on the IBBI and its proper function as a regulator.
The Supreme Court recently upheld the constitutionality of the IBC. I agree with the Court’s conclusion, but I don’t agree with how it got there.
Two news items that made me smile.
Navroz Seervai and I talk constitutional law and the Sabarimala judgment.
The final part of my analysis of the Supreme Court's ArcelorMittal judgment, focusing on the Supreme Court's views of how the 270 day timeline prescribed by the IBC is to be managed.
Part II of my analysis of the super-important ArcelorMittal judgment. This one deals with the Supreme Court's view of what factors are to be considered to determine the eligibility of a bidder.
Last Thursday, the Supreme Court passed what is, viewed from any angle, the most significant judgment in the short history of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. My piece.
Since the time the government opened up the sector for investment, the story of India’s private power producers has resembled that of Mr. Micawber – and they are about to be put into a modern day version of debtors’ prison, after the Allahabad High Court refused to spare them the ignominy of IBC proceedings.
I interview Ravi Kadam, one of the country's top senior advocates, and one of the most sought-after counsel in IBC matters.
After being told to do so for decades, the Government has finally decided that it is time for India to adopt the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency.